|
|
||||
![]() |
THE MIRACLE ON MAIN STREET: MOMS: still true after all these years by F. Tupper Saussy Several people within earshot broke into laughter. Each said in his turn, Me, too! Yes, MOMS
did ruin a lot of lives, including my own. But in a necessary way, in
the way maturity ruins adolescence, or Christs indwelling spirit
ruins a life of evildoing. MOMS ruined
values and beliefs that had to die if one was to grow in integrity. A Colorado paralegal once told me that he thought MOMS was naíve. I complimented him on getting the point. Doesnt the law presume us all to be naive? Doesnt the law expect us to believe it means what it says? Cant we safely trust that no harm will come to us if we obey the law? Cant we safely expect that those sworn to uphold the law will, in fact, uphold the law? Thousands of readers picked up on MOMS naivety and, taking their cue from Barry Buxkampers cover painting, went out to the public offices determined to hold officials accountable under the clearly-stated monetary provisions of the Constitution. The Constitution places responsibility for a sound economy on the state governments. As MOMS reveals, the framers of the Constitution unanimously said No! to the possibility that American citizens might ever be compelled to surrender their gold and silver coin for a paper currency. The No! of the framers resounds through more than two centuries of Congressional legislation and Supreme Court decisions. Ah, but the people have said Yes. In the mid-1960s,
perhaps still disoriented from JFK's assassination, they chose to permit
Congress to shirk its duty to coin gold and silver. And a decade later,
the peoples use of a national currency having no intrinsic value
whatsoever permitted the states to evade their self-imposed task of preserving
the inviolability of property rights in America. Popular assent to a kind
of money the Constitution was written to prohibit forever was a triumph
of ignorance. The result
has been catastrophic. You can attribute everything from the Vietnamese
debacle to the USA Patriot Actsforty years of societal disintegrationto
the popular ignorance of state and federal governments duty to provide
a national currency that cannot be expanded or contracted by committee
or edict. Had the people
been alert and vocal, the constitutional monetary system would have eliminated
any need whatsoever for the southeast Asian war, the central American
wars, the Gulf War, the war on drugs and now against terrorism and soon
against meaningful dissentand their horrifying moral, emotional,
physical, and political toll. As long as our most outspoken political leaders and reformers continue to ignore the Constitutions strict economic requirements on Congress and the states, things will only get worse. Advocates of a better America push for relieving symptoms, when the true remedy is stopping cause. And the cause remains what it was back in the 1980s heyday of MOMS: too few people are demanding that Congress and the state governments obey the intent and the letter of the Constitutions monetary provisions. The absence of rebuke is taken to mean the people consent to the disobedience. Jim Woods, who wrote the Foreword to MOMS, was a brilliant inventor for whom intellectual and personal freedom were tools of his trade. To Jim, Article I Sections 8 and 10 of the Constitution were the linchpin that held the whole American apparatus together. Keep the linchpin in place and the apparatus can run forever. Remove it and everything falls apart. What MOMS pointed out, as had few other books before it, was that the linchpin had been removed by popular demand. We the People had permitted its removal. And now that we are suffering the certain symptoms of its absence, only We the People can put it back. The Miracle On Main Street presents the simple directions, as good today as in the 1980s, and as good in the 80s as in 1789. |
|||